Preface |
|
xiii | |
|
|
|
Business, Ethics, and the Free Market |
|
|
1 | (22) |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
Business Ethics: The ``Free Market'' Theory |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
Reading 1.1 The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits |
|
|
7 | (4) |
|
|
Doing Business Ethics: An Analysis of Freidman |
|
|
11 | (11) |
|
Friedman's Radical Position |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
|
16 | (4) |
|
Is Obedience to the Law Enough? |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Philosophical Ethics: Utilitarianism and the Free Market |
|
|
23 | (21) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (8) |
|
Virtue Ethics: What Type of Person Should I Be? |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
Utilitarianism: Maximize the Overall Good |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
Deontology: An Ethics of Rights and Duties |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Utilitarian Defense of the Free Market |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
An Analysis of the Utilitarian Defense |
|
|
34 | (8) |
|
Is the Free Market the Best Means? |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
The ``Good'' of Free Market Utilitarianism |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
Means and Ends Challenges |
|
|
40 | (2) |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
Philosophical Ethics: Rights and the Market |
|
|
44 | (20) |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (9) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
Basic and Derivative Rights: Resolving Conflicts |
|
|
52 | (3) |
|
Two Rights Arguments for the Free Market |
|
|
55 | (9) |
|
The Right to Liberty and the Market |
|
|
56 | (3) |
|
Private Property Rights and the Market |
|
|
59 | (5) |
|
The Corporation as a Social Institution |
|
|
64 | (49) |
|
|
64 | (1) |
|
The Nature of the Corporation |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
The Role of the Corporation |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
The Structure of the Corporation |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
The Legal Status of the Corporation |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (7) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
The Corporation as a Morally Responsible Agent |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
Corporate Governance and Control |
|
|
73 | (2) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Reading 4.1 A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism |
|
|
76 | (8) |
|
|
|
Reading 4.2 Bad and Not-So-Bad Arguments for Shareholder Primacy |
|
|
84 | (12) |
|
|
Reading 4.3 Just Say No to Wall Street: Putting a Stop to the Earnings Game |
|
|
96 | (6) |
|
|
|
Reading 4.4 Assessing Executive Compensation |
|
|
102 | (11) |
|
|
II BUSINESS AND EMPLOYEES |
|
|
|
Employee Rights: Job Security and Participation |
|
|
113 | (72) |
|
|
113 | (1) |
|
Job Security: Dismissals and Layoffs |
|
|
114 | (10) |
|
|
114 | (5) |
|
|
119 | (5) |
|
|
124 | (6) |
|
Varieties of Participation |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Participation and Firm Performance |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Participation and Organized Labor |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Case Study: Employee Relations at EDS |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
Reading 5.1 Meaningful Work: A Kantian Approach |
|
|
130 | (6) |
|
|
Reading 5.2 The Right to Due Process |
|
|
136 | (5) |
|
|
Reading 5.3 Rights in the Workplace: A Nozickian Argument |
|
|
141 | (4) |
|
|
Reading 5.4 Practices of Successful Organizations: Employment Security |
|
|
145 | (11) |
|
|
Reading 5.5 An Ethical Basis for Employee Participation |
|
|
156 | (7) |
|
|
Reading 5.6 Workplace Representation Overseas: The Works Councils Story |
|
|
163 | (22) |
|
|
|
Decision Scenario A: Levi's Shrinks |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Unwritten Employment Contracts |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario C: Montana's Just Cause Legislation |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: Saturn Motors: Shifting into Reverse? |
|
|
179 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario E: The German Model of Employee Participation |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario F: Electromation: Illegal Employee Participation |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario G: Donnelly Mirrors: Fifty Years of Participation |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Employee Rights: Health, Equality, Privacy |
|
|
185 | (50) |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (4) |
|
Government Regulations to Protect Health and Safety |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Health Insurance and Work |
|
|
189 | (1) |
|
Equal Treatment in the Workplace |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
|
193 | (4) |
|
Nature and Value of Privacy |
|
|
193 | (3) |
|
Case Study: Health Insurance and Discrimination against the Sick |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Readings 6.1 The Occupational Safety and Health Problem |
|
|
197 | (6) |
|
|
Readings 6.2 Sex is the Least of It: Let's Focus Harassment Law on Work, Not Sex |
|
|
203 | (4) |
|
|
Readings 6.3 Disability and the Right to Work |
|
|
207 | (6) |
|
|
Readings 6.4 The Problem with ``Dead Peasants'' Insurance |
|
|
213 | (9) |
|
|
Readings 6.5 Drug Testing in Employment |
|
|
222 | (13) |
|
|
|
Decision Scenario A: American Cyanamid and Johnson Controls |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Genetic Screening in the Workplace |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario C: When Gender Harassment is Not Sexual |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: Dismissal for an Abortion? |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario E: If You Work Here, Don't Smoke |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario F: Preemployment Psychological Testing |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario G: E-mail Privacy |
|
|
233 | (2) |
|
Ethical Responsibilities in Business: Employees, Managers, Professionals |
|
|
235 | (49) |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
Honesty, Loyalty, and Trust |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
Professional Responsibilities and the Gatekeeper Function |
|
|
239 | (4) |
|
Case Study: Accounting for Enron |
|
|
240 | (3) |
|
Reading 7.1 Is Business Bluffing Ethical? |
|
|
243 | (8) |
|
|
Reading 7.2 Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty |
|
|
251 | (5) |
|
|
Reading 7.3 Understanding Enron: ``It's About the Gatekeepers, Stupid'' |
|
|
256 | (8) |
|
|
Reading 7.4 Public Accounting: Profession or Business? |
|
|
264 | (5) |
|
|
Reading 7.5 Auditing Ethics |
|
|
269 | (15) |
|
|
|
Decision Scenario A: Martha Stewart, ImClone, and InsiderTrading |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Timing Mutual Funds |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario C: ``Soft Money'' in the Securities Industry |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: Buy American, or Else! |
|
|
282 | (2) |
|
III BUSINESS AND CONSUMERS |
|
|
|
Product Liability and Safety |
|
|
284 | (39) |
|
The History of Product Liability |
|
|
284 | (3) |
|
Assessing Product Liability Alternatives |
|
|
287 | (2) |
|
Reforming Product Liability Law |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
Product Safety Regulation |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
Ethics and the Marketing of Dangerous Products |
|
|
292 | (4) |
|
Case Study: Caution: McDonald's Coffee is HOT---And Its Food Will Make You FAT! |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
Reading 8.1 Who Pays for Tort Liability Claims? An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Tort Liability System |
|
|
296 | (9) |
|
|
Reading 8.2 Fairness, Strict Liability and Public Policy |
|
|
305 | (2) |
|
|
Reading 8.3 Social Products Liability: The Case of the Firearms Manufacturers |
|
|
307 | (16) |
|
|
Decision Scenario A: Tobacco Companies under Fire |
|
|
314 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Selling Guns: Negligent Marketing? |
|
|
316 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario C: The Michigan Toy Box Company |
|
|
318 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: A.H. Robins and the Dalkon Shield |
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario E: Diethylstilbestrol (DES) |
|
|
320 | (3) |
|
Marketing Ethics: Advertising, Sales, and Consumerism |
|
|
323 | (63) |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
Deceptive Advertising and Sales |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
Nondeceptive Marketing, Autonomy, and Consumer Vulnerability |
|
|
325 | (3) |
|
Marketing and Consumerism |
|
|
328 | (4) |
|
Case Study: Nike: Advertising, Marketing, and Free Speech |
|
|
329 | (3) |
|
Reading 9.1 Deceptive Advertising |
|
|
332 | (5) |
|
|
Reading 9.2 Deception and Withholding Information in Sales |
|
|
337 | (11) |
|
|
Reading 9.3 Advertising and Behavior Control |
|
|
348 | (8) |
|
|
Reading 9.4 Marketing to Inner-City Blacks: Powermaster and Moral Responsibility |
|
|
356 | (10) |
|
|
Reading 9.5 Children as Consumers: An Ethical Evaluation of Children's Television Advertising |
|
|
366 | (7) |
|
|
Reading 9.6 Why Do We Consume So Much? |
|
|
373 | (13) |
|
|
Decision Scenario A: Marketing in School |
|
|
379 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Advertising's Images of Women |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario C: Advertising Headaches |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: New, Improved, . . . and Smaller |
|
|
383 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario E: Political Advocacy Meets High-Tech Ad Agencies |
|
|
384 | (2) |
|
IV BUSINESS AND OTHER CONSTITUENCIES |
|
|
|
Business and The Natural Environment |
|
|
386 | (54) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
Business, the Environment, and Economics |
|
|
387 | (2) |
|
Sustainable Development and Business |
|
|
389 | (5) |
|
Case Study: Interface Corporation: Sustainable Business |
|
|
390 | (4) |
|
Reading 10.1 People or Penguins: The Case for Optimal Pollution |
|
|
394 | (4) |
|
|
Reading 10.2 Why Political Questions Are Not All Economic |
|
|
398 | (6) |
|
|
Reading 10.3 Morality, Money, and Motor Cars |
|
|
404 | (5) |
|
|
Reading 10.4 Sustainable Business: Environmental Responsibilities and Business Opportunities |
|
|
409 | (7) |
|
|
Reading 10.5 A Road Map for Natural Capitalism |
|
|
416 | (11) |
|
|
|
|
Reading 10.6 The Next Industrial Revolution |
|
|
427 | (13) |
|
|
|
Decision Scenario A: Global Warming |
|
|
434 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co. |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario C: The Detroit Project |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: Pacific Lumber |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario E: Walt Disney v. the Sierra Club |
|
|
438 | (2) |
|
Affirmative Action and Diversity |
|
|
440 | (31) |
|
|
440 | (1) |
|
Public Policy to Counter Discrimination |
|
|
441 | (3) |
|
Arguments For and Against |
|
|
443 | (1) |
|
|
444 | (3) |
|
Case Study: The University of Michigan Cases |
|
|
445 | (2) |
|
Reading 11.1 Preferential Hiring and Compensation |
|
|
447 | (7) |
|
|
Reading 11.2 A Defense of Programs of Preferential Treatment |
|
|
454 | (4) |
|
|
Reading 11.3 Brief in Support of the University of Michigan |
|
|
458 | (13) |
|
|
Decision Scenario A: United Steelworkers of America v. Weber |
|
|
465 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Preferential Treatment for Men? |
|
|
466 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario C: Women Wage Earners: Less Is Best? |
|
|
467 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: Federal Set-Asides: From Fullilove to Adarand |
|
|
468 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario E: Hide the Wedding Ring |
|
|
470 | (1) |
|
Ethics and Multinational Corporations |
|
|
471 | (66) |
|
The Power of Multinationals |
|
|
471 | (1) |
|
The Ethical Relativist Approach |
|
|
472 | (2) |
|
The Nonrelativist Approach |
|
|
474 | (4) |
|
Case Study: Africa, AIDS and Drug Patents |
|
|
476 | (2) |
|
Reading 12.1 Rights and the Global Market |
|
|
478 | (14) |
|
|
Reading 12.2 The Great Non-Debate over International Sweatshops |
|
|
492 | (9) |
|
|
Reading 12.3 Sweatshops and Respect for Persons |
|
|
501 | (15) |
|
|
|
Reading 12.4 Marketing, the Ethics of Consumption, and Less-Developed Countries |
|
|
516 | (21) |
|
|
Decision Scenario A: Indonesian Corruption and Multinationals |
|
|
529 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario B: Brazil: Economic Development versus Environmental Protection |
|
|
531 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario C: ``When in Rome'': International Affirmative Action |
|
|
532 | (1) |
|
Decision Scenario D: Child and Bonded Labor: Business Responsibility for Supplier Practices |
|
|
533 | (2) |
|
Decision Scenario E: Drug Safety and the Third World |
|
|
535 | (2) |
Index |
|
537 | |