| ABOUT THE EDITORS |
|
ix | |
| LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS |
|
xi | |
| OVERVIEW: MULTI-LEVEL ISSUES IN SOCIAL SYSTEMS |
|
|
Fred Dansereau and Francis J. Yammarino |
|
|
1 | (12) |
| PART I: HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT |
|
|
MULTI-LEVEL FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING HRM PRACTICES IN CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXTS |
|
|
|
Kerstin A. Aumann and Cheri Ostroff |
|
|
13 | (68) |
|
AN ORGANIZATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ON MULTI-LEVEL CULTURAL INTEGRATION: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CROSS-CULTURAL CONTEXTS |
|
|
|
Xiao-Ping Chen and Anne S. Tsui |
|
|
81 | (16) |
|
INTEGRATING HRM PRACTICES INTO A MULTI-LEVEL MODEL OF CULTURE: CULTURE'S VALUES, DEPTH, AND STRENGTH |
|
|
|
|
|
97 | (12) |
|
MULTI-LEVEL FIT: COMPLEXITY, VALUES, AND CLIMATE |
|
|
|
Kerstin A. Aumann and Cheri Ostroff |
|
|
109 | (14) |
| PART II: CONTINUOUS LEARNING |
|
|
CONTINUOUS LEARNING IN ORGANIZATIONS: A LIVING SYSTEMS ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL, GROUP, AND ORGANIZATION LEARNING |
|
|
|
Manuel London and Valerie I. Sessa |
|
|
123 | (50) |
|
CONTINUOUS LEARNING: WHY IS IT STILL AN ISSUE? |
|
|
|
David V. Day and Brian W. Tate |
|
|
173 | (16) |
|
A MULTI-LEVEL INQUIRY AND ELABORATION: CONTINUOUS LEARNING WITHIN AND ACROSS ORGANIZATIONS, GROUPS, AND INDIVIDUALS |
|
|
|
Steven E. Markham, Richard L. Groesbeck and Bret R. Swan |
|
|
189 | (12) |
|
CONTINUOUS LEARNING ABOUT CONTINUOUS LEARNING: CLARIFYING AND EXPANDING A MULTI-LEVEL, LIVING SYSTEM'S ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
Valerie I. Sessa and Manuel London |
|
|
201 | (16) |
| PART III: DIVORCE AND FAMILY |
|
|
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE COMMON FAMILY BACKGROUND FOR THE SIMILARITY OF DIVORCE RISKS OF SIBLINGS: A MULTI-LEVEL EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
Jaap Dronkers and Joop Hox |
|
|
217 | (22) |
|
SIBLING EFFECTS ON DIVORCE: COMMON FAMILY BACKGROUND, COMMON GENETIC HERITAGE, OR CONTINUING INTERACTION AMONG ADULT SIBLINGS |
|
|
|
|
|
239 | (4) |
|
MULTI-LEVEL EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS FOR A SIBLING DESIGN: THE CHOICE OF PREDICTOR VARIABLES |
|
|
|
|
|
243 | (10) |
|
ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF COMMON FAMILY BACKGROUND FOR THE SIMILARITY OF DIVORCE RISKS OF SIBLINGS |
|
|
|
Jaap Dronkers and Joop Hox |
|
|
253 | (6) |
| PART IV: INDUSTRY–UNIVERSITY DYNAMICS |
|
|
INDUSTRY–UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DYNAMICS AS A MULTI-LEVEL PHENOMENON |
|
|
|
|
|
259 | (42) |
|
INDUSTRY–UNIVERSITY RELATIONSHIPS AND THE CONTEXT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DYNAMICS: THE CASE OF IBM |
|
|
|
|
|
301 | (20) |
|
INDUSTRY–UNIVERSITY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER: MOVING THE RESEARCH AGENDA FORWARD |
|
|
|
|
|
321 | (12) |
|
INDUSTRY–UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN CONTEXT: FRAMING THE DEAL, AND DEALING WITH THE FRAME(S) |
|
|
|
|
|
333 | (12) |
| PART V: ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP |
|
|
THE LAMPE THEORY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEADERSHIP |
|
|
|
|
|
345 | (84) |
|
"BREAKING THE FRAME" EVEN FARTHER: COMPLEXITY SCIENCE AND LAMPE THEORY |
|
|
|
Mary Uhl-Bien and Russ Marion |
|
|
429 | (14) |
|
SOME IDEAS ABOUT TESTING PROCESSUAL THEORIES |
|
|
|
|
|
443 | |
| PART VI: ABOUT THE AUTHORS |
|
|
|
|
479 | |