Color Plates |
|
xxxv | |
Preface |
|
xxxvii | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xlvi | |
|
Part One Overview of Argument |
|
|
1 | (72) |
|
Argument: An Introduction |
|
|
3 | (19) |
|
What Do We Mean by Argument? |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Argument Is Not a Fight or a Quarrel |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
Argument Is Not Pro-Con Debate |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Arguments Can Be Explicit or Implicit |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Wilfred Owen, ``Dulce et Decorum Est'' |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
The Defining Features of Argument |
|
|
7 | (6) |
|
Argument Requires Justification of Its Claims |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
Argument Is Both a Process and a Product |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Argument Combines Truth Seeking and Persuasion |
|
|
10 | (3) |
|
Argument and the Problem of Truth |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
A Successful Process of Argumentation: The Well-Functioning Committee |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
Gordon Adams (student),``Petition to Waive the University Mathematics Requirement'' |
|
|
17 | (4) |
|
|
21 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (28) |
|
Why Reading Arguments Is Important for Writers |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
Strategy 1: Reading as a Believer |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
Lisa Turner,``Playing with Our Food'' |
|
|
25 | (7) |
|
Summary Writing as a Way of Reading to Believe |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
Suspending Doubt: Willing Your Own Belief in the Writer's Views |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
Strategy 2: Reading as a Doubter |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
Strategy 3: Exploring How Rhetorical Context and Genre Shape the Argument |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
Understanding the Genres of Argument |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
Analyzing Rhetorical Context and Genre |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
Strategy 4: Seeking Out Alternative Views and Analyzing Sources of Disagreement |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
Disagreement about Facts or Their Relevance |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
Disagreement about Values, Beliefs, or Assumptions |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
Council for Biotechnology Information, ``Why Biotech Labeling Can Confuse Consumers'' |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
Writing an Analysis of a Disagreement |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
``An Analysis of the Sources of Disagreement between Lisa Turner and the Council for Biotechnology Information'' |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
Strategy 5: Using Disagreement Productively to Prompt Further Investigation |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
Accepting Ambiguity and Uncertainty |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Seeking Sources of Facts and More Complete Versions of Alternative Views |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
Determining What Values Are at Stake for You and Articulating Your Own Values |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
Considering Ways to Synthesize Alternative Views |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (23) |
|
Who Writes Arguments and Why? |
|
|
50 | (3) |
|
Tips for Improving Your Writing Process |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
Starting Point, Exploration, and Research |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
Revising through Multiple Drafts |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
Editing for Style, Impact, and Correctness |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
Using Exploratory Writing to Discover Ideas and Deepen Thinking |
|
|
56 | (7) |
|
Freewriting or Blind Writing |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
Playing the Believing and Doubting Game |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
Brainstorming for Pro and Con Because Clauses |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Brainstorming a Network of Related Issues |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
Shaping Your Argument: Classical Argument as a Planning Tool |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
The Structure of Classical Argument |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
An Illustration of Classical Argument as a Planning Guide |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
Discovering Ideas: Two Sets of Exploratory Writing Tasks |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
Set 2: Exploration and Rehearsal |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignments for Chapters 1-3 |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
Part Two Principles of Argument |
|
|
73 | (120) |
|
The Core of an Argument: A Claim with Reasons |
|
|
75 | (12) |
|
An Introduction to the Classical Appeals |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
Issue Questions as the Origins of Argument |
|
|
76 | (3) |
|
Difference between an Issue Question and an Information Question |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
Difference between a Genuine Argument and a Pseudo-Argument |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
Pseudo-Arguments: Fanatical Believers and Fanatical Skeptics |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
Another Source of Pseudo-Arguments: Lack of Shared Assumptions |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
Frame of an Argument: A Claim Supported by Reasons |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
Advantages of Expressing Reasons in Because Clauses |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
Application of This Chapter's Principles to Your Own Writing |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Application of This Chapter's Principles to the Reading of Arguments |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
The Logical Structure of Arguments |
|
|
87 | (22) |
|
An Overview of Logos: What Do We Mean by the ``Logical Structure'' of an Argument? |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
Adopting a Language for Describing Arguments: The Toulmin System |
|
|
91 | (6) |
|
Using Toulmin's Schema to Determine a Strategy of Support |
|
|
97 | (5) |
|
The Power of Audience-Based Reasons |
|
|
102 | (6) |
|
Difference between Writer-Based and Audience-Based Reasons |
|
|
102 | (3) |
|
Finding Audience-Based Reasons: Asking Questions about Your Audience |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Using Evidence Effectively |
|
|
109 | (20) |
|
General Principles for the Persuasive Use of Evidence |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
Apply the STAR Criteria to Evidence |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Use Sources That Your Reader Trusts |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Rhetorical Understanding of Evidence |
|
|
111 | (11) |
|
|
111 | (5) |
|
Angle of Vision and the Selection and Framing of Evidence |
|
|
116 | (2) |
|
Rhetorical Strategies for Framing Evidence |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
Special Strategies for Framing Statistical Evidence |
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
Creating a Plan for Gathering Evidence |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Gathering Data from Interviews |
|
|
122 | (1) |
|
Gathering Data from Surveys or Questionnaires |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignments for Chapters 4-6 |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
David Langley (student),`` `Half-Criminals' or Urban Athletes? A Plea for Fair Treatment of Skateboarders'' |
|
|
126 | (3) |
|
Moving Your Audience: Ethos, Pathos, and Kairos |
|
|
129 | (12) |
|
Ethos and Pathos as Persuasive Appeals: An Overview |
|
|
129 | (2) |
|
How to Create an Effective Ethos: The Appeal to Credibility |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Be Knowledgeable about Your Issue |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
Build a Bridge to Your Audience |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
How to Create Pathos: The Appeal to Belief and Emotions |
|
|
132 | (4) |
|
|
133 | (1) |
|
Use Specific Examples and Illustrations |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
Choose Words, Metaphors, and Analogies with Appropriate Connotations |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
Using Images for Emotional Appeal |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
Kairos: The Timeliness and Fitness of Arguments |
|
|
138 | (2) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
Accommodating Your Audience: Treating Differing Views |
|
|
141 | (20) |
|
One-Sided, Multisided, and Dialogic Arguments |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
Determining Your Audience's Resistance to Your Views |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
Appealing to a Supportive Audience: One-Sided Argument |
|
|
145 | (1) |
|
Appealing to a Neutral or Undecided Audience: Classical Argument |
|
|
145 | (5) |
|
Summarizing Opposing Views |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
|
147 | (1) |
|
Strategies for Rebutting Evidence |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Conceding to Opposing Views |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
Example of a Student Essay Using Refutation Strategy |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
Marybeth Hamilton (student), From ``First Place: A Healing School for Homeless Children'' |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
Appealing to a Resistant Audience: Dialogic Argument |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
|
153 | (1) |
|
Ellen Goodman, ``Minneapolis Pornography Ordinance'' |
|
|
153 | (4) |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
Rebekah Taylor (student), ``A Letter to Jim'' |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignment for Chapters 7 and 8 |
|
|
159 | (2) |
|
Conducting Visual Arguments |
|
|
161 | (32) |
|
Understanding Design Elements in Visual Argument |
|
|
162 | (4) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
An Analysis of a Visual Argument Using Type and Spatial Elements |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Drug Enforcement Administration, ``A Single Hit of Ecstasy ...'' (advocacy advertisement) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
Common Sense for Drug Policy, ``What We Know About Ecstasy'' (advocacy advertisement) |
|
|
167 | (3) |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
Use of Images and Graphics |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
An Analysis of a Visual Argument Using All the Design Components |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
The Compositional Features of Photographs and Drawings |
|
|
170 | (6) |
|
An Analysis of a Visual Argument Using Images |
|
|
172 | (4) |
|
The Genres of Visual Argument |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
Public Affairs Advocacy Advertisements |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
The Pro-Choice Public Education Project, ``When Your Right ...'' (advocacy advertisement) |
|
|
178 | (4) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Constructing Your Own Visual Argument |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
Leah Johnson (student), ``Drink and Then Drive? Jeopardize My Future?'' (poster) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
Using Information Graphics in Arguments |
|
|
185 | (4) |
|
How Tables Contain a Variety of Stories |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
Using a Graph to Tell a Story |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
|
188 | (1) |
|
Incorporating Graphics into Your Argument |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Numbering, Labeling, and Titling the Graphic |
|
|
190 | (1) |
|
Referencing the Graphic in Your Text |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignments for Chapter 9 |
|
|
192 | (1) |
|
Part Three Arguments in Depth: Six Types of Claims |
|
|
193 | (164) |
|
An Introduction to the Types of Claims |
|
|
195 | (13) |
|
An Overview of the Types of Claims |
|
|
195 | (5) |
|
Type 1: Simple Categorical Arguments (Is X a Y?, Where You and Your Audience Agree on the Meaning of Y) |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
Type 2: Definitional Arguments (Is X a Y?, Where the Definition of Y Is Contested) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Type 3: Cause/Consequence Arguments (Does X Cause Y? Is Y a Consequence of X?) |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
Type 4: Resemblance Arguments (Is X Like Y?) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Type 5: Evaluation Arguments (Is X Good or Bad? Is X a Good or Bad Y?) |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Type 6: Proposal Arguments (Should We Do X?) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
How Knowledge of Claim Types Will Help You Focus an Argument and Generate Ideas |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
Hybrid Arguments: How Claim Types Work Together in Arguments |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
Some Examples of Hybrid Arguments |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
An Extended Example of a Hybrid Argument |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
Aaron Friedman, ``All That Noise for Nothing'' |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
Categorical and Definitional Arguments: X Is (Is Not) a Y |
|
|
208 | (34) |
|
An Overview of Categorical Arguments |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
Simple Categorical Arguments |
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
Difference between Facts and Simple Categorical Claims |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
Variations in the Wording of Simple Categorical Claims |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Supporting Simple Categorical Claims: Supply Examples |
|
|
212 | (1) |
|
Refuting Simple Categorical Claims |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
An Overview of Definitional Arguments |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
The Criteria-Match Structure of Definitional Arguments |
|
|
214 | (3) |
|
Conceptual Problems of Definition |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
Why Can't We Just Look in the Dictionary? |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
Definitions and the Rule of Justice: At What Point Does X Quit Being a Y? |
|
|
217 | (2) |
|
|
219 | (3) |
|
|
219 | (2) |
|
Effect of Context and Authorial Purpose on Aristotelian Definitions |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
Strategies for Defining the Contested Term in a Definitional Argument |
|
|
222 | (4) |
|
Reportive Approach: Research How Others Have Used the Term |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
Stipulative Approach: Create Your Own Definition |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
Conducting the Match Part of a Definitional Argument |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
Writing a Definitional Argument |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignment for Chapter 11 |
|
|
227 | (3) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
Organizing a Definitional Argument |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
Questioning and Critiquing a Definitional Argument |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
``Low-Carb Diets Unhealthy Trend'' |
|
|
231 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``Low-Carb Diets Unhealthy Trend'' |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
Kathy Sullivan (student), ``Oncore, Obscenity, and the Liquor Control Board'' |
|
|
234 | (2) |
|
Critiquing ``Oncore, Obscenity, and the Liquor Control Board'' |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
Charles Krauthammer, ``This Isn't a `Legal' Matter, This Is War'' |
|
|
236 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``This Isn't a `Legal' Matter, This Is War'' |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
Eugene Volokh, ``You Can Blog, But You Can't Hide'' |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``You Can Blog, But You Can't Hide'' |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
Causal Arguments: X Causes (Does Not Cause) Y |
|
|
242 | (28) |
|
An Overview of Causal Arguments |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
The Nature of Causal Arguing |
|
|
244 | (1) |
|
Describing a Causal Argument in Toulmin Terms |
|
|
245 | (2) |
|
Three Methods for Arguing That One Event Causes Another |
|
|
247 | (6) |
|
First Method: Explain the Causal Mechanism Directly |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
Second Method: Use Various Inductive Methods to Establish a High Probability of a Causal Link |
|
|
249 | (3) |
|
Third Method: Argue by Analogy or Precedent |
|
|
252 | (1) |
|
Glossary of Terms Encountered in Causal Arguments |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
Writing Your Causal Argument |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignment for Chapter 12 |
|
|
255 | (3) |
|
|
255 | (2) |
|
Organizing a Causal Argument |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
Questioning and Critiquing a Causal Argument |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
Daeha Ko (student), ``The Monster That Is High School'' |
|
|
259 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``The Monster That Is High School'' |
|
|
261 | (1) |
|
United Way, ``Kids Who Do Not Participate ...'' (advocacy advertisement) |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
Critiquing the United Way Advocacy Ad |
|
|
262 | (1) |
|
Olivia Judson, ``Different but (Probably) Equal'' |
|
|
263 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``Different but (Probably) Equal'' |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
Carlos Macias (student), ```The Credit Card Company Made Me Do It!'---The Credit Card Industry's Role in Causing Student Debt'' |
|
|
266 | (4) |
|
Critiquing ``The Credit Card Company Made Me Do It!'' |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
Resemblance Arguments: X Is (Is Not) Like Y |
|
|
270 | (19) |
|
An Overview of Resemblance Arguments |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
|
273 | (3) |
|
Using Undeveloped Analogies |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
|
274 | (2) |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
Writing a Resemblance Argument |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignment for Chapter 13 |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
Organizing a Resemblance Argument |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
Questioning and Critiquing a Resemblance Argument |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
Megan Matthews (student), ``Whales Need Silence'' |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
Critiquing ``Whales Need Silence'' |
|
|
281 | (1) |
|
Matthew Miller, ``It Shouldn't Take a Disaster to Help America's Blameless'' |
|
|
281 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``It Shouldn't Take a Disaster to Help America's Blameless'' |
|
|
283 | (1) |
|
Sven Van Assche, ``Knock! Knock!'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
Critiquing the Internet Chat Room Cartoon |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
Susan Brownmiller, From Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape |
|
|
285 | (4) |
|
Critiquing the Passage from Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
Evaluation and Ethical Arguments: X Is (Is Not) a Good Y; X Is Right (Wrong) |
|
|
289 | (31) |
|
An Overview of Evaluation Arguments |
|
|
289 | (1) |
|
Criteria-Match Structure of Categorical Evaluations |
|
|
290 | (2) |
|
Conducting a Categorical Evaluation Argument |
|
|
292 | (4) |
|
Determining Criteria for a Categorical Evaluation Argument |
|
|
292 | (2) |
|
Determining Whether X Meets the Criteria |
|
|
294 | (2) |
|
An Overview of Ethical Arguments |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
Two Major Ethical Systems |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
Consequences as the Base of Ethics |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
Principles as the Base of Ethics |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
Conducting an Ethical Argument |
|
|
298 | (3) |
|
Constructing a Principles-Based Argument |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
Constructing a Consequences-Based Argument |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
Common Problems in Making Evaluation Arguments |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
Writing an Evaluation Argument |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignment for Chapter 14 |
|
|
302 | (3) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
Organizing an Evaluation Argument |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
Questioning and Critiquing an Evaluation Argument |
|
|
305 | (3) |
|
Critiquing a Categorical Evaluation Argument |
|
|
305 | (1) |
|
Critiquing an Ethical Argument |
|
|
306 | (2) |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
Sam Isaacson (student), ``Would Legalization of Gay Marriage Be Good for the Gay Community?'' |
|
|
308 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``Would Legalization of Gay Marriage Be Good for the Gay Community?'' |
|
|
310 | (1) |
|
Tiffany Anderson (student), ``A Woman's View of Hip-Hop'' |
|
|
311 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``A Woman's View of Hip-Hop'' |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
Mike Luckovich, ``The Military's Raising Enlistment Age'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
314 | (1) |
|
Critiquing the Military Recruitment Cartoon |
|
|
315 | (1) |
|
Geoffrey Johnson, ``Marking Earth Day Inc.'' |
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
Critiquing ``Marking Earth Day Inc.'' |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
David Holcberg, ``Human Organs for Sale?'' |
|
|
317 | (3) |
|
Critiquing ``Human Organs for Sale?'' |
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
Proposal Arguments: We Should (Should Not) Do X |
|
|
320 | (37) |
|
An Overview of Proposal Arguments |
|
|
321 | (1) |
|
The Structure of Proposal Arguments |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
Special Concerns for Proposal Arguments |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
The Need to Overcome People's Natural Conservatism |
|
|
322 | (1) |
|
The Difficulty of Predicting Future Consequences |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
The Problem of Evaluating Consequences |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
Developing a Proposal Argument |
|
|
323 | (2) |
|
Convincing Your Readers That a Problem Exists |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
Showing the Specifics of Your Proposal |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
The Justification: Convincing Your Readers That Your Proposal Should Be Enacted |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
Proposal Arguments as Advocacy Posters or Advertisements |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
Using the Claim-Type Strategy to Develop a Proposal Argument |
|
|
326 | (5) |
|
Using the ``Stock Issues'' Strategy to Develop a Proposal Argument |
|
|
331 | (2) |
|
Writing a Proposal Argument |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
Writing Assignment for Chapter 15 |
|
|
333 | (5) |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
Organizing a Proposal Argument |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
|
336 | (2) |
|
Designing a One-Page Advocacy Advertisement |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
Questioning and Critiquing a Proposal Argument |
|
|
338 | (1) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
Laurel Wilson (student), ``A Proposal to Provide Tips for Hosts at Stone's End'' |
|
|
340 | (4) |
|
Critiquing ``A Proposal to Provide Tips for Hosts at Stone's End'' |
|
|
343 | (1) |
|
Mark Bonicillo (student), ``A Proposal for Universal Health Insurance in the United States'' (MLA-style research paper) |
|
|
344 | (7) |
|
Critiquing ``A Proposal for Universal Health Insurance in the United States'' |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
Center for Children's Health and the Environment, ``More Kids Are Getting Brain Cancer. Why?'' (advocacy advertisement) |
|
|
351 | (2) |
|
Critiquing the Advocacy Ad from the Center for Children's Health and the Environment |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
Maia Szalavitz, ``Let a Thousand Licensed Poppies Bloom'' |
|
|
353 | (4) |
|
Critiquing ``Let a Thousand Licensed Poppies Bloom'' |
|
|
355 | (2) |
|
Part Four The Researched Argument |
|
|
357 | (69) |
|
Finding and Evaluating Sources |
|
|
359 | (28) |
|
Formulating a Research Question |
|
|
360 | (2) |
|
Understanding Differences in the Kinds of Sources |
|
|
362 | (5) |
|
Books versus Periodicals versus Web Sites |
|
|
362 | (1) |
|
Scholarly Books versus Trade Books |
|
|
362 | (4) |
|
Scholarly Journals versus Magazines |
|
|
366 | (1) |
|
Print Sources versus Cyberspace Sources |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
Finding Books: Searching Your Library's Online Catalog |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
Finding Print Articles: Searching a Licensed Database |
|
|
368 | (2) |
|
What Is a Licensed Database? |
|
|
368 | (1) |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
Illustration of a Database Search |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
Finding Cyberspace Sources: Searching the World Wide Web |
|
|
370 | (5) |
|
The Logic of the Internet |
|
|
371 | (2) |
|
|
373 | (1) |
|
Determining Where You Are on the Web |
|
|
373 | (2) |
|
Reading Your Sources Rhetorically |
|
|
375 | (2) |
|
Reading with Your Own Goals in Mind |
|
|
375 | (1) |
|
Reading with Rhetorical Awareness |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
|
378 | (3) |
|
|
378 | (1) |
|
|
379 | (2) |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
Understanding the Rhetoric of Web Sites |
|
|
381 | (4) |
|
The Web as a Unique Rhetorical Environment |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
Analyzing the Purpose of a Site and Your Own Research Purpose |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
Sorting Sites by Domain Type |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
|
383 | (2) |
|
National Resources Defense Council, ``Spread of Active Sonar Threatens Whales'' (Web page) |
|
|
385 | (1) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
Using, Citing, and Documenting Sources |
|
|
387 | (39) |
|
Using Sources for Your Own Purposes |
|
|
387 | (3) |
|
Creating Rhetorically Effective Attributive Tags |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
Using Attributive Tags to Separate Your Ideas from Your Source's |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
Creating Attributive Tags to Shape Reader Response |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
Working Sources into Your Own Prose |
|
|
391 | (4) |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (3) |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
Understanding Parenthetical Citation Systems with Bibliographies |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
|
397 | (12) |
|
The MLA Method of In-Text Citation |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
MLA Format for the ``Works Cited'' List |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (9) |
|
Formatting an Academic Paper in MLA Style |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
Student Example of an MLA-Style Research Paper |
|
|
409 | (1) |
|
|
409 | (8) |
|
APA Method of In-Text Citation |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
APA Format for the ``References'' List |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
|
411 | (6) |
|
|
417 | (1) |
|
Student Example of an APA-Style Research Paper |
|
|
417 | (1) |
|
Megan Matthews (student), ``Sounding the Alarm: Navy Sonar and the Survival of Whales'' |
|
|
418 | (8) |
|
|
426 | (25) |
|
|
426 | (9) |
|
The Problem of Conclusiveness in an Argument |
|
|
426 | (1) |
|
An Overview of Informal Fallacies |
|
|
427 | (8) |
|
|
428 | (1) |
|
|
429 | (1) |
|
|
430 | (5) |
|
The Writing Community: Working in Groups |
|
|
435 | (16) |
|
From Conflict to Consensus: How to Get the Most Out of the Writing Community |
|
|
435 | (2) |
|
Avoiding Bad Habits of Group Behavior |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
The Value of Group Work for Writers |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
Forming Writing Communities: Skills and Roles |
|
|
437 | (4) |
|
Working in Groups of Five to Seven People |
|
|
437 | (2) |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
Group Project: Holding a ``Norming Session'' to Define ``Good Argumentative Writing'' |
|
|
441 | (2) |
|
|
443 | (1) |
|
``RSS Should Not Provide Dorm Room Carpets'' |
|
|
444 | (2) |
|
``Sterling Hall Dorm Food'' |
|
|
446 | (1) |
|
``ROTC Courses Should Not Get College Credit'' |
|
|
446 | (2) |
|
``Legalization of Prostitution'' |
|
|
448 | (1) |
|
|
449 | (2) |
|
Part Five An Anthology of Arguments |
|
|
451 | (288) |
|
An Overview of the Anthology |
|
|
452 | (1) |
|
Guide Questions for the Analysis and Evaluation of Arguments |
|
|
453 | (3) |
|
List 1: Questions for Analyzing and Evaluating a Conversation |
|
|
453 | (1) |
|
List 2: Questions for Analyzing and Evaluating an Individual Argument |
|
|
454 | (1) |
|
List 3: Questions for Responding to a Reading and Forming Your Own Views |
|
|
455 | (1) |
|
Finding Soldiers: The Volunteer Army, Recruitment, and the Draft |
|
|
456 | (28) |
|
Donald Rumsfeld, ``New Model Army'' |
|
|
456 | (3) |
|
Phillip Carter and Paul Glastris, ``The Case for the Draft'' |
|
|
459 | (11) |
|
Anna Quindlen, ``Uncle Sam and Aunt Samantha'' |
|
|
470 | (2) |
|
Tim Dickinson, ``The Return of the Draft'' |
|
|
472 | (3) |
|
Louis Caldera, ``Military Service'' |
|
|
475 | (2) |
|
``Weapons of Mass Instruction'' (advertisement) |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
Kathryn Roth-Douquet, ``Military Service Can Open the Eyes of Country's `Elite''' |
|
|
478 | (1) |
|
Matt Carmody, ``I Need You'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
479 | (1) |
|
David L. Englin, ``Military Misconceptions'' |
|
|
480 | (2) |
|
|
482 | (2) |
|
Responses to Terrorism: Public Safety and Civil Liberties |
|
|
484 | (23) |
|
John Ashcroft, ``Testimony to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary'' |
|
|
484 | (4) |
|
Deborah Pearlstein, ``Rights in an Insecure World'' |
|
|
488 | (5) |
|
Michelle Malkin, ``Racial Profiling: A Matter of Survival'' |
|
|
493 | (2) |
|
Arsalan Iftikhar, ``Losing Liberties'' |
|
|
495 | (2) |
|
Wayne Stayskal, ``Civil Liberties Groups Resist Government'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
497 | (1) |
|
Patricia J. Williams, ``To See or Not to See'' |
|
|
498 | (2) |
|
Michael Levin, ``The Case for Torture'' |
|
|
500 | (2) |
|
McQ, ``Situational Ethics and the Argument for Torture'' |
|
|
502 | (3) |
|
|
505 | (2) |
|
The United States as Sole Superpower |
|
|
507 | (28) |
|
George W. Bush, ``Graduation Speech at West Point'' |
|
|
508 | (4) |
|
Richard Falk, ``The New Bush Doctrine'' |
|
|
512 | (5) |
|
John J. Miller, ``Our `Next Manifest Destiny''' |
|
|
517 | (5) |
|
Michael Krepon, ``Weapons in the Heavens: A Radical and Reckless Option'' |
|
|
522 | (7) |
|
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space, ``Keep Space for Peace'' (poster) |
|
|
529 | (2) |
|
Samuel Huntington, ``The Great American Myth'' |
|
|
531 | (2) |
|
|
533 | (2) |
|
Environmental Friendliness versus Market Freedom: The Case of the Sport-Utility Vehicle |
|
|
535 | (26) |
|
John Bragg, ``The American Dream: Why Environmentalists Attack the SUV'' |
|
|
535 | (2) |
|
Henry Payne and Diane Katz, ``Gas and Gasbags ... or, the Open Road and Its Enemies'' |
|
|
537 | (3) |
|
Keith Bradsher, ``Gimme an SUV---ASAP: Teenagers Are the Next Big Market for Sport-Utility Vehicles---and the Consequences Could Be Deadly'' |
|
|
540 | (6) |
|
SUV.org, ``Environmental Double Standards for Sport Utility Vehicles'' |
|
|
546 | (6) |
|
Arianna Huffington, ``Road Outrage: How Corporate Greed and Political Corruption Paved the Way for the SUV Explosion'' |
|
|
552 | (3) |
|
Paul Roberts, ``Running Out of Oil---and Time'' |
|
|
555 | (2) |
|
Thomas L. Friedman, ``As Toyota Goes ...'' |
|
|
557 | (2) |
|
Khalil Bendib, ``Oil and War'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
559 | (1) |
|
|
560 | (1) |
|
Wal-Mart and the Public Good |
|
|
561 | (23) |
|
Floyd J. McKay, ``Wal-Mart Nation: The Race to the Bottom'' |
|
|
561 | (2) |
|
Robert B. Reich, ``Don't Blame Wal-Mart'' |
|
|
563 | (2) |
|
Liza Featherstone, ``Down and Out in Discount America'' |
|
|
565 | (6) |
|
Pankaj Ghemawat and Ken A. Mark, ``The Price Is Right'' |
|
|
571 | (1) |
|
The New York Times, ``The Wal-Martization of America'' |
|
|
572 | (1) |
|
Steve Maich, ``Why Wal-Mart Is Good'' |
|
|
573 | (8) |
|
David Horsey, ``A New World to Conquer'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
581 | (1) |
|
|
582 | (2) |
|
Biotech Agriculture and the Ethics of Food Production |
|
|
584 | (26) |
|
Jonathan Rauch, ``Will Frankenfood Save the Planet?'' |
|
|
584 | (9) |
|
Miguel A. Altieri and Peter Rosset, ``Ten Reasons Why Biotechnology Will Not Ensure Food Security, Protect the Environment, and Reduce Poverty in the Developing World'' |
|
|
593 | (8) |
|
``Monsantoland'' (poster) |
|
|
601 | (1) |
|
Gregory A. Jaffe, ``Lessen the Fear of Genetically Engineered Crops'' |
|
|
601 | (2) |
|
Froma Harrop, ``Food Industry Should Modify Its Stance on Altered Food'' |
|
|
603 | (1) |
|
Sustainusa.org, ``What Is the FDA Trying to Feed Us?'' (poster) |
|
|
604 | (1) |
|
Gerald D. Coleman, ``Is Genetic Engineering the Answer to Hunger?'' |
|
|
605 | (4) |
|
|
609 | (1) |
|
The Cultural Debate on Stem Cell Research and Cloning |
|
|
610 | (24) |
|
Richard Hayes, ``It's Worth Copying Canada's Model for Cloning Legislation'' |
|
|
611 | (1) |
|
Robert A. Weinberg, ``Of Clones and Clowns'' |
|
|
612 | (8) |
|
Judith Levine, ``What Human Genetic Modification Means for Women'' |
|
|
620 | (5) |
|
Jean Swenson, ``Embryonic Stem Cell Fairy Tales'' |
|
|
625 | (2) |
|
Mario M. Cuomo, ``Not on Faith Alone'' |
|
|
627 | (2) |
|
Mona Charen, ``Stem Cell Simplicities'' |
|
|
629 | (1) |
|
Charles Krauthammer, ``Expand Stem Cells Ethically'' |
|
|
630 | (2) |
|
|
632 | (2) |
|
In Search of Perfection: Steroids, Bionic Athletes, and Designer Children |
|
|
634 | (25) |
|
Michael Dillingham, ``Steroids, Sports and the Ethics of Winning'' |
|
|
635 | (1) |
|
Rick Collins, ``Steroids and Sports: A Provocative Interview with Norm Fost, M.D.'' |
|
|
636 | (5) |
|
Ellis Cashmore, ``Doping Scandal: Stop Testing and Legalize All Drugs'' |
|
|
641 | (2) |
|
Carl Elliott, ``This Is Your Country on Drugs'' |
|
|
643 | (2) |
|
William Saletan, ``The Beam in Your Eye: If Steroids Are Cheating, Why Isn't LASIK?'' |
|
|
645 | (4) |
|
George Neumayr, ``The New Eugenics'' |
|
|
649 | (4) |
|
Michael J. Sandel, ``What's Wrong with Enhancement'' |
|
|
653 | (4) |
|
|
657 | (2) |
|
Marriage and Family in the New Millennium |
|
|
659 | (24) |
|
Patrick Fagan and Jennifer Garrett, ``Restoring a Culture of Marriage: Good News for Policymakers from the Fragile Families Survey'' |
|
|
659 | (8) |
|
Alternatives to Marriage Project, ``Statement Regarding Hearing on Welfare and Marriage Issues'' |
|
|
667 | (2) |
|
Andrew Sullivan, ``Here Comes the Groom: A (Conservative) Case for Gay Marriage'' |
|
|
669 | (4) |
|
Jeff Kemp and Harvey Drake, Jr., ``Marriage Still Matters to Washington's Children'' |
|
|
673 | (1) |
|
Froma Harrop, ``Gay, Straight: What's the Deal?'' |
|
|
674 | (2) |
|
Hila Colman, ``Who Needs a Husband?'' |
|
|
676 | (1) |
|
Myrna Blyth, ``The Hearth Defended: A Review of Home-Alone America: The Hidden Toll of Day Care, Wonder Drugs, and Other Parent Substitutes by Mary Eberstadt'' |
|
|
677 | (3) |
|
Lynne K. Varner, ``Moms on the Front Lines of America's Culture Wars'' |
|
|
680 | (2) |
|
|
682 | (1) |
|
The Media and Public Responsibility: What Counts As News and Who Decides? |
|
|
683 | (25) |
|
Sydney H. Schanberg, ``Not a Pretty Picture'' |
|
|
683 | (3) |
|
Floyd J. McKay, ``Digital Technology in the Age of Terror'' |
|
|
686 | (1) |
|
Mark Bowden, ``News Judgment and Jihad'' |
|
|
687 | (2) |
|
Daniel Okrent, ``No Picture Tells the Truth. The Best Do Better than That'' |
|
|
689 | (4) |
|
William Powers, ``The Massless Media'' |
|
|
693 | (5) |
|
Amy Goodman and David Goodman, ``Why Media Ownership Matters: The More You Watch, the Less You Know'' |
|
|
698 | (4) |
|
Jack Rosenthal, ``What to Do When News Grows Old Before Its Time'' |
|
|
702 | (3) |
|
Amotz Asa-El, ``Too Narrow a Focus'' |
|
|
705 | (2) |
|
|
707 | (1) |
|
Gender and Technology in Advertising |
|
|
708 | (8) |
|
Haloid Xerox, ``This Is Automatic Xerography'' |
|
|
709 | (1) |
|
FedEx Express, ``Like Magellan, Grady Has Pioneered a Global Network'' and ``Maria Hates Computers'' |
|
|
710 | (2) |
|
Technology Review, ``Try a MIT's Magazine of Innovation ...'' |
|
|
712 | (1) |
|
Siemens Corporation, ``Spacious Corner Office, Redefined'' |
|
|
713 | (1) |
|
|
714 | (2) |
|
Internet Controversies: Blogs, Hate Sites, and Spam |
|
|
716 | (23) |
|
Daniel W. Drezner and Henry Farrell, ``Web of Influence'' |
|
|
716 | (9) |
|
Nicholas D. Kristof, ``Death by a Thousand Blogs'' |
|
|
725 | (2) |
|
Jeff Chu, ``You Wanna Take This Online?'' |
|
|
727 | (2) |
|
Adey Bryant, ``Sarah, It's That Bloke ...'' (political cartoon) |
|
|
729 | (1) |
|
Kenneth Lake, ``Hate Speech Conviction Outlaws Email'' |
|
|
730 | (1) |
|
Lawrence J. Magid, ``Internet's Hate Sites Can Be Hidden, But They Can't Be Ignored'' |
|
|
731 | (2) |
|
Adam Cohen, ``The Constitution Does Not Protect Spamming'' |
|
|
733 | (2) |
|
Sarah Gordon, ``Distributing Viruses'' |
|
|
735 | (2) |
|
|
737 | (2) |
Credits |
|
739 | (6) |
Index |
|
745 | |